Weise, Christian: Die drey ärgsten Ertz-Narren. 2. Aufl. 1673.Lexicon Philosophicum Rodolphi Go- clenii. Flor. Quid audio? an Goclenius, qui con- tradictiones philosophicas conciliavit, nostrae etiam controversiae medelam affer- re poterit? Praec. Quid ego curo; credat unusquisque, quicquid vult. Fl. Mirum est, Theologum practicum adeo propendere ad Syncretismum. Praec. Hocego non facio. Flor. Provoco ad auditores. Interim si displicet quaestio prior, veniamusad alte- ram, Concionatores enim quatenus tales sunt, mihi quidem non videntur Theologi. Praec. Rogote, noli tam absurda statuere. Flor. Ego sic argumentor; Artifex non est Theologus, Concionator quatenus talis est artifex. E. Praec. Me oportet ridere, quod Syllogismum profers, in quo omnes tres propositiones sunt absurdae. Flor. Cupis probationem? Praec. Non non, impossibile est, ut probari possit. Flor. Sic ego nunquam memini disputare. Praec,
Lexicon Philoſophicum Rodolphi Go- clenii. Flor. Quid audio? an Goclenius, qui con- tradictiones philoſophicas conciliavit, noſtræ etiam controverſiæ medelam affer- re poterit? Præc. Quid ego curo; credat unusquisque, quicquid vult. Fl. Mirum eſt, Theologum practicum adeò propendere ad Syncretiſmum. Præc. Hocego non facio. Flor. Provoco ad auditores. Interim ſi diſplicet quæſtio prior, veniamusad alte- ram, Concionatores enim quatenus tales ſunt, mihi quidem non videntur Theologi. Præc. Rogote, noli tam abſurda ſtatuere. Flor. Ego ſic argumentor; Artifex non eſt Theologus, Concionator quatenus talis eſt artifex. E. Præc. Me oportet ridere, quòd Syllogismum profers, in quo omnes tres propoſitiones ſunt abſurdæ. Flor. Cupis probationem? Præc. Non non, impoſſibile eſt, ut probari poſſit. Flor. Sic ego nunquam memini diſputare. Præc,
<TEI> <text> <body> <div n="1"> <sp> <p> <pb facs="#f0261" n="255"/><lb/> <hi rendition="#aq">Lexicon Philoſophicum Rodolphi Go-<lb/> clenii.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Flor.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Quid audio? an Goclenius, qui con-<lb/> tradictiones philoſophicas conciliavit,<lb/> noſtræ etiam controverſiæ medelam affer-<lb/> re poterit?</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Præc.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Quid ego curo; credat unusquisque,<lb/> quicquid vult.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Fl.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Mirum eſt, Theologum practicum adeò<lb/> propendere ad Syncretiſmum.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Præc.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Hocego non facio.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Flor.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Provoco ad auditores. Interim ſi<lb/> diſplicet quæſtio prior, veniamusad alte-<lb/> ram, Concionatores enim quatenus<lb/> tales ſunt, mihi quidem non videntur<lb/> Theologi.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Præc.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Rogote, noli tam abſurda ſtatuere.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Flor.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Ego ſic argumentor; Artifex non eſt<lb/> Theologus, Concionator quatenus talis<lb/> eſt artifex. E.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Præc.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Me oportet ridere, quòd Syllogismum<lb/> profers, in quo omnes tres propoſitiones<lb/> ſunt abſurdæ.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Flor.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Cupis probationem?</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Præc.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Non non, impoſſibile eſt, ut probari<lb/> poſſit.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <sp> <speaker> <hi rendition="#aq">Flor.</hi> </speaker> <p> <hi rendition="#aq">Sic ego nunquam memini diſputare.</hi> </p> </sp><lb/> <fw place="bottom" type="catch"> <hi rendition="#aq">Præc,</hi> </fw><lb/> </div> </body> </text> </TEI> [255/0261]
Lexicon Philoſophicum Rodolphi Go-
clenii.
Flor. Quid audio? an Goclenius, qui con-
tradictiones philoſophicas conciliavit,
noſtræ etiam controverſiæ medelam affer-
re poterit?
Præc. Quid ego curo; credat unusquisque,
quicquid vult.
Fl. Mirum eſt, Theologum practicum adeò
propendere ad Syncretiſmum.
Præc. Hocego non facio.
Flor. Provoco ad auditores. Interim ſi
diſplicet quæſtio prior, veniamusad alte-
ram, Concionatores enim quatenus
tales ſunt, mihi quidem non videntur
Theologi.
Præc. Rogote, noli tam abſurda ſtatuere.
Flor. Ego ſic argumentor; Artifex non eſt
Theologus, Concionator quatenus talis
eſt artifex. E.
Præc. Me oportet ridere, quòd Syllogismum
profers, in quo omnes tres propoſitiones
ſunt abſurdæ.
Flor. Cupis probationem?
Præc. Non non, impoſſibile eſt, ut probari
poſſit.
Flor. Sic ego nunquam memini diſputare.
Præc,
Suche im WerkInformationen zum Werk
Download dieses Werks
XML (TEI P5) ·
HTML ·
Text Metadaten zum WerkTEI-Header · CMDI · Dublin Core Ansichten dieser Seite
Voyant Tools
|
URL zu diesem Werk: | https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/weise_ertznarren_1672 |
URL zu dieser Seite: | https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/weise_ertznarren_1672/261 |
Zitationshilfe: | Weise, Christian: Die drey ärgsten Ertz-Narren. 2. Aufl. 1673, S. 255. In: Deutsches Textarchiv <https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/weise_ertznarren_1672/261>, abgerufen am 18.08.2024. |